"Charges of Pakistan Lack Credibility"  and India seeks UN court order to bar execution of naval officer 1

“Charges of Pakistan Lack Credibility” and India seeks UN court order to bar execution of naval officer

1 min


192 shares

India took Pakistan to the United Nations’ highest court Monday in an attempt to save the life of an Indian naval officer sentenced to death last month by a Pakistani military court after being convicted of espionage.

Charges-of-Pakistan-Lack-Credibility-and-India-seeks-UN-court-order-to-bar-execution-of-naval-officer-sub1-Buzzyat.jpg

In April, Pakistan delivered a death sentence to Jadhav (who was arrested on March 3, 2016), holding him responsible for alleged “espionage and sabotage activities”. In response, India sent across 16 requests, asking Pakistan to grant consular access to its former naval officer. However, after having those pleas systematically shot down, it approached the United Nation’s judicial arm, on May 8, 2017.

India claims that Pakistan breached a long-standing international convention on consular relations by not granting Indian officials access to Kulbhushan Jadhav after his arrest last year.

“It is clear that Mr. Jadhav has been denied the right to be defended by a legal counsel of his choice. He has not been informed of his right to seek consular access,” Mittal said, adding that the conviction and death sentence appeared to be based on a confession made while “in captivity without proper legal representation.”

Pakistan challenged India’s argument, stating that Atlantique was in fact, flying in its own air space, in an operational area which was approximately 70 to 90 miles east of Karachi. In view of this, Pakistan claimed damages, demanding India to shell out $60 million as compensation. India, ignored the demand.

"Charges of Pakistan Lack Credibility"  and India seeks UN court order to bar execution of naval officer 3

In April, a four-day long open hearing was held. After two months, on June 21, 2000, ICJ gave its decision: it rejected Pakistan's case, presuming that the Court couldn't react or engage the application documented by Pakistan, since the case did not go under its ward. A seat of 16 judges had voted 14-2. 

However, ICJ mentioned that although this dispute did not come under its jurisdiction, it did not mean that the States were not obliged to peacefully and respectfully settle their differences.

Pakistani officials have said that Jadhav has the right to appeal to a military appeals court or petition the army chief for mercy. Also, under the constitution, Pakistan’s president could pardon Jadhav.

The Pakistani officials say Jadhav has been linked to 1,345 deaths in acts of terrorism in Pakistan, using fake ID to make secret trips to Pakistan from Iran before his arrest in 2016.

The case is likely to take months or years to resolve, so India is asking the world court to immediately order Pakistan to “take all measures necessary” to prevent Jadhav’s execution pending the final outcome.

The court’s president already has written to Pakistan urging it to take no action that could affect the hearings – effectively a request to prevent the death sentence being carried out.


0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Choose A Format
Personality quiz
Series of questions that intends to reveal something about the personality
Trivia quiz
Series of questions with right and wrong answers that intends to check knowledge
Poll
Voting to make decisions or determine opinions
Story
Formatted Text with Embeds and Visuals
List
The Classic Internet Listicles
Ranked List
Upvote or downvote to decide the best list item
Countdown
The Classic Internet Countdowns
Open List
Submit your own item and vote up for the best submission
Meme
Upload your own images to make custom memes
Video
Youtube, Vimeo or Vine Embeds
Audio
Soundcloud or Mixcloud Embeds
Image
Photo or GIF
Gif
GIF format